International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Volume 2, Number 2, July 2008
Return
to current issues page
Excerpt
Effects of Active Learning Variants on Student Performance
and Learning Perceptions
This paper aims to examine the relative impacts of three different
models of learning (collaborative learning, traditional lecturing and
process-oriented guided inquiry learning [POGIL]) on student performance
and learning perceptions. In a controlled case study, we measured the
learning outcomes of 57 undergraduates in a chemistry course taught
by the different learning modules, using quizzes and exams as performance
measures. In one academic quarter, the collaborative learning method
was used exclusively whereas all three models were used subsequently
in a second quarter by dividing up lectures into 4 different modules.
Student quiz and exam outcomes indicated significant difference between
collaborative learning and traditional lecturing (P = 0.01) but not
within the active learning variants or POGIL versus traditional lecturing
(P > 0.05), suggesting students performed best on content taught
by collaborative learning. When prompted to pick a learning module,
67% of the students chose collaborative learning but not POGIL, indicative
of student preference for one active learning variant over the other.
However, student engagement and higher-order thinking appeared to be
higher under the POGIL module though both skills were also evident during
the collaborative learning period. Based on the outcome of the present
study, it is recommended that purely inquiry-based lectures should employ
short-burst intermittent lecturing to overcome student resistance and
negative perceptions.
View
Full Article
Bio
Abdi-Rizak Mohamed
North Seattle Community College
Seattle, Washington, USA
amohamed@sccd.ctc.edu
I currently teach general chemistry series for our science majors and
introductory chemistry courses for non-science majors entering paramedical
and allied health fields such as nursing, nutrition, and dental hygiene
at North Seattle Community College. I believe that the role of the science
teacher is to develop student abilities in critical thinking, symbolic
reasoning, and independence and thus prefer student-centered strategies
that encourage learning by engaging students. Since I view teaching
as a form of scholarship analogous to the scholarship of discovery and
basic research, my interests in SoTL include understanding how active
learning variants enhance student performance, investigations into student
understanding of biological and chemical concepts, and how to transform
traditional laboratories in the sciences into inquiry-based student-centered
labs.
Return
to current issues page
|